Join Us
Joining the Taxpayers' Union costs only $25 and entitles you to attend our annual conference, AGM and other events.
The Taxpayers’ Union is calling on the Green Party to front up on whether its tech tax proposals are a breach of New Zealand’s treaty on double-taxation with the US.
Taxpayers’ Union spokesman James Ross said:
“Earlier this month, Chlöe Swarbrick said New Zealand needs to be responsible and uphold its international treaties or our trading relationships will be at risk. That was about the Paris Agreement, but does it only apply to treaties her party likes?”
“Despite the Greens’ claims, their ‘tech tax’ isn’t just better enforcement. Inland Revenue already has all the powers it needs to crack down on tech firms avoiding tax, IRD's expert analysts haven't just blanket reclassified offshore sales and service fees as royalties for a reason.”
“The Greens’ proposals can work one of two ways. Either IRD can review each tech firm’s business arrangements individually, as they do now. Only those which are actually dodging tax will see any tax changes, and the policy will be a damp squib with marginal revenue.”
“Or the Greens could legislate to rewrite how tech companies are taxed. Unilaterally deciding to tax sales booked offshore as if they were royalties - like the Greens are planning for Netflix and credit card companies - would likely breach our double tax agreement with the US.”
“The US is our second-largest market, with 12 percent of New Zealand’s domestic goods exports heading to America last year. If Swarbrick wants to try to sneak a digital services tax through the backdoor and start a trade war, the least she could do is let Kiwis know.”
Labour has today promised to fund maternity scans through its capital gains tax, but the Taxpayers’ Union says the money has already been swallowed by other spending promises. Once again, Labour’s numbers do not add up.
Taxpayers’ Union spokesman James Ross said:
“Using recent housing market data, Labour’s CGT would raise just 38.6 percent of what Labour claims by 2029/30. The tax revenue wouldn’t even cover the cost of Labour’s three taxpayer-funded GP visits, let alone any new spending commitments.”
“Labour’s CGT revenue is already spent, and there’s no money left in that pot. Where is Labour expecting to find another $28.6 million a year?”
“There are only three ways Labour’s capital gains tax can raise enough to cover its promises: rampant inflation, spiralling house prices, or expanding the tax onto main homes, shares, or KiwiSaver. Labour needs to front up to New Zealanders about which one it is planning.”
Responding to the Prime Minister floating a potential bed tax on Newstalk ZB this morning, New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union spokesperson Tory Relf said:
“The Prime Minister needs to categorically rule out slapping domestic travellers with yet another tax.
“Make no mistake: a bed tax won’t just hit overseas tourists staying in flash hotels. If it applies to domestic travellers, it would hit Kiwis staying at DOC campsites or the local TOP 10 holiday park."
“Previous research by Tourism Industry Aotearoa found only 30 percent of international visitors stay in commercial accommodation. That means a bed tax risks falling mostly on Kiwis, not tourists."
“New Zealanders travelling around their own country, whether for work, family, or holidays, should not be caught up in a tourist tax."
“If the Government wants to target international visitors, it should say so clearly. But domestic travellers must be off the table.”
With the support of hundreds of supporters like you, we managed to secure a four-page lift-out in the NZ Herald this week to coincide with the final day on our 'Hands Off Our Homes: Stop Central Planning Committees' roadshow.
View a high-res image of the ad here
David Parker's reforms would strip democratic control over resource allocation and planning decisions from local councils and place them in the hands of unelected, co-governed central planning committees.
The Government has learnt its lesson from Three Waters and isn't spending millions of taxpayer dollars on TV adverts (or otherwise talking about what they are doing) this time. Our main objective with the nationwide roadshow tour was to raise awareness about these reforms and explain to New Zealanders what these radical changes will mean for them.
Over the coming weeks we will continue to expose Minister Parker's Soviet-style central planning committees for what they are and make it a major political thorn in the Government's side as we head towards October's election.
We can only force this matter onto the political agenda with people power. If you haven't already, please take a moment to add your name to the petition opposing these undemocratic reforms.
Not content with ripping away democratic control of water infrastructure and planning powers from local councils, a Government-appointed panel this week released their final report into the future of local government.
As we predicted, the report advocates for even more centralisation and removal of local voice and democratic accountability from decision making. The report recommends reorganizing local government with "the resource management reform boundaries as a starting point for discussions". 😳
This would amount to a mass amalgamation of New Zealand's councils further reducing the ratepayers' ability to engage in the democratic process.
New Zealand is one of the most highly centralized countries in the world. Just a tenth of government expenditure is delivered through our councils. And those councils are extremely large by international comparisons. Auckland's Super City is a prime example of bigger not being better – rather than save money it's led to more managers, more layers of bureaucracy, and much higher rates.
This Review presented a great opportunity to fix the issues in local councils and put power closer to the people, Instead it has focussed on identity politics and public sector gimmicks like citizens’ assemblies and "participatory budgeting". And the only structural reforms it proposes would likely see more centralizations and a further undermining of democratic accountability.
New Zealanders aren’t interested in nebulous concepts like embedding a wellbeing focus in local government – they want to see high quality services delivered at a local level for the lowest rates possible. That means small, democratically accountable, powerful local councils where local people have the opportunity every three years to kick out politicians who aren’t performing.

At the end of this month, in the middle of a cost of living crisis, taxpayers up and down New Zealand will be slapped with four new tax increases, so get ready as Grant Robertson is coming for your wallet.
On 1 July, the following taxes are increasing:
🛑 Petrol excise by 29 cents/litre (including GST)
🛑 Road user charges by 56%
🛑 Ute tax by up to $1,725
🛑 Alcohol tax by 6.6%
Worse still, all four tax increases will have a disproportionately large impact on rural and poorer households.
Cost of living crisis? What cost of living crisis?
The fuel excise and diesel road user charge increases will punish those who often don't have any other choice but to drive either due to where they live or the nature of their work.
Similarly, the ute tax will slam hard-working farmers and tradies who simply don't have any other option but to drive a ute – for them, they are tools of the trade. This increase is particularly cruel for those who lost vehicles in the recent flooding and will now have to pay up to $6,900 in tax just to replace a damaged work vehicle.
And where does this money go? To subsidize those in the cities (where public transport is an option) so they can buy themselves a new Tesla.
Tens of thousands of New Zealanders have already signed our petition calling for the ute tax to be scrapped. You can sign the petition here.
After all those tax hikes, you may need a beer or two to relax but, after a 6.9% alcohol excise hike last year, it's going up a further 6.6% this year too! Cheers.
David Parker’s Tax Principles Bill faced scrutiny at Select Committee last week, and of course your humble Taxpayers’ Union was there to give them a piece of taxpayers’ minds.
Scores of interested parties turned up to rip holes in this bill, which if nothing else shows one thing: Despite David Parker’s protestations that his 7 ‘principles’ were universally agreed upon fact, clearly they are little more than the preferences of one man and his lackeys.
For instance, take the Government’s attempt to enshrine in law the idea that tax systems must be progressive. Our economist, Ray Deacon, made the point that “there is no reason why a flat tax applied across all income levels, with an appropriately structured system of transfer payments, cannot achieve the goals that a progressive tax system is aiming for.” As it happens, even the Inland Revenue Department agrees with us!
Many of these "principles" would screw the scrum by shutting down democratic debate on our tax system by claiming Labour's opinions are objective fact and handing the power to dictate tax policy to an unelected Commissioner. If these principles are universal, Minister Parker must live in a different universe to us.
In our written submission, we suggested that the bill be withdrawn or, at the very least, should be reworked to be based on the Tax Foundation's Principles of Sound Tax Policy.
Ray also suggested that it would be more appropriate to rename the proposal as the Tax Preferences Bill. At least then the Government would be honest in their intentions. You can watch our submission here.
In our last update, we called for Michael Wood's resignation over his failure to appropriately manage his conflict of interest as Minister of Transport while owning shares in Auckland Airport. Our petition has since gathered thousands of signatures.

It subsequently emerged that Wood had undeclared financial interest in a number of other areas that conflicted with his Ministerial responsibilities. It was also revealed that Minister Wood was contacted 16 times by the Cabinet Office to sell his shares, not just the 12 times that had previously been stated. For multiple breaches of disclosure requirements as bad as this, Prime Minister Hipkins shouldn't have given Wood the opportunity to resign and should have sacked him instead!
This is a significant victory for taxpayers and one we care deeply about – accountability is one of the three key pillars of our mission. All taxpayers are entitled to expect that Ministers appropriately manage conflicts of interest and are, well, honest. Democracies can only function properly when the public has confidence that Ministers' personal financial interests aren't influencing decisions.
When Ministers fail to uphold high standards of transparency and accountability, public trust in Government is eroded and it lowers the bar for what is considered acceptable conduct by future Ministers. Hipkins has yet to rule out Wood's return to the Cabinet table in a future Government. We say this should be the end of Mr Wood's political career.
We welcome the announcement that work is underway to improve Cabinet's systems for managing conflicts of interest, we can only hope that this yields more accountability rather than just another box-ticking exercise.
Thank you for your support.
Yours aye,
![]() |
|
Media coverage:
The Spinoff New poll points to National-Act government despite bump for Greens
NZ Herald Political poll: National, Act could form Government
Stuff National and ACT could form government, according to latest poll
RNZ New poll shows National, ACT keeping edge ahead of Labour
Politik Collins paves the way
The Working Group with David Farrar, Raf Manji and Damien Grant
Newstalk ZB Afternoon Edition: 14 June 2023 (02:08)
NZ Herald Te Pāti Māori coalition a drag on Labour - poll
Otago Daily Times Council won't pay for statue: mayor
Newstalk ZB THE RE-WRAP: Gang Gaslighting Continues (07:09)
NZ Herald Will a recession lose Labour the election? PM Chris Hipkins, Grant Robertson respond
Otago Daily Times Poll: mayor should stay, not chief exec
The Press Govt told capital gains tax is not a ‘universally accepted’ taxation principle
NZ Local Government Magazine Reactions to Local Government Review report
The Platform David Farrar on the DIA making unauthorised changes to the Three Waters bill
interest.co.nz A super-majority of voters want to fix tax bracket creep but only two political parties agree
On Monday, we kicked off our nationwide tour to Stop Central Planning Committees in Christchurch and the team are currently working their way down the South Island – tonight we are jointly hosting an event with Federated Farmers at 6pm at the Invercargill Workingmen's Club (details of all the events are on our website here).
Make no mistake, David Parker's replacement to the Resource Management Act will make resource consenting even harder. While Three Waters was about taking control of community assets — to put into centralized, co-governed entities — these bills are about taking control of planning laws and what you can do with your home, your property, or your farm — taking the control away from democratically elected councils to put them in 15 centralized, co-governed, so-called 'Regional Planning Committees'.
The effects will be dramatic. As a voter, you will no longer be able to hold to account the decision makers who will determine what you can produce on your farm, build on your property, or how your community is planned. The Federated Farmers and the Taxpayers' Union are no fans of the current Resource Management Act, but David Parker's new regime will make getting a resource consent much, much harder.
Unlike Three Waters, the Government isn't talking about these bills or making the public aware of what it is doing. That's why we've taken to the road.
Thanks to everyone who has come along to our events so far. Check out this video from Star News to see what we have been up to.

You can learn more about the proposed reforms at www.HandsOffOurHomes.nz
You can find our full itinerary at www.taxpayers.org.nz/roadshow

We look forward to meeting you on the road.

To be fair to David Parker, he has certainly been keeping busy (and keeping us busy!). Not content with trying to ram through undemocratic planning laws to replace the RMA, he's also been continuing his long-standing campaign to radically change our tax system.
His pet project report that was published several weeks ago used an extremely wide definition of economic income – including things like unrealized capital gains – to suggest that wealthier New Zealanders were not paying their fair share of tax and make the case for higher taxes. Despite the Prime Minister quickly ruling out a capital gains tax or wealth tax in this term, David Parker got his way with the trustee tax rate.
In the budget, Grant Robertson announced that the rate would rise from 33 to 39 percent from 1 April next year. This won't just affect the wealthiest David Parker says he is targeting. There are around 400,000 trusts in New Zealand, but only 9,000 have an income of more than $180,000 and they may be able to pay the 28 percent rate by leaving more money in company structures.
This will be yet another tax hike on families who legitimately use trusts to protect assets such as their homes and small businesses. On average, each trust will pay an extra $1,260 each year. So much for 'no new taxes'...
The budget was also a bitter disappointment for people across New Zealand who are struggling with the cost of living. The increased deficit will drive inflation further and forced the Reserve Bank to hike interest rates yet again, which will be felt be those looking to renew their mortgages.
And what did Kiwis get in return? Not a lot. The removal of the $5 prescription charge, 'free' childcare for 2-year-olds while not addressing the lack of staff, and a large subsidy for the gaming industry. What people really desperately need is some tax relief.
And it seems most New Zealanders agree. A new poll out on Sunday encouragingly showed that more than half of voters think that now is the right time to introduce tax cuts.
Chris Hipkins protests that tax cuts now would be inflationary while conveniently ignoring the inflationary effects of Grant Robertson's larger deficit. Tax cuts would only drive inflation if not matched by spending cuts. Scrapping the $2.8 million campaign to tell us to take shorter showers would be a good place to start...
For all the talk of focussing on the cost of living and supporting those who are struggling, Labour's congress last weekend announced anything but. Despite previously acknowledging that the retirement age of 65 is unaffordable, Labour committed to keep it in place and the so-called 'winter energy payment'.
The Universal Winter Energy Payment for retirees isn't even that popular. A Taxpayers' Union – Curia poll from earlier this month found that 58 percent of New Zealanders supported targeting the payments to those superannuitants on lower incomes. Only 30 percent opposed targeting.

Making handouts universal means working class taxpayers pay more for the better off to heat their pools. New Zealanders can see through the spin and understand that this is not a good use of taxpayer money. Support should be targeted to those people who are most in need.

Here at the Taxpayers' Union, we believe that decisions are best made as close to the people they affect as possible. More often than not that means getting the Government to stop interfering with our lives full stop, but sometimes it means taking decisions in our communities rather than letting them be taken by politicians in Wellington.
The problem is that too often the real power in our councils doesn't rest with mayors and councillors but instead is in the hands of unelected officials. We have seen these problems come into sharp focus in Gore where a longstanding council chief executive seems to be unwilling to work with their new democratically elected mayor.
I faced similar challenge serving as a councillor in Scotland where unelected officials would use all manner of ways to obstruct the wishes of democratically elected representatives and, ultimately, of the voters. Writing in the Otago Daily Times, I explain why this issue is such a problem for our local democracy.
Thank you for your support.
Yours aye,
![]() |
|
Media coverage:
Rural News Expensive pet food!
NZ City Latest polling has National's support once again overtaking Labour's
NZ Herald Taxpayers’ Union-Curia poll: National and Act could govern alone; Labour down but Hipkins more popular than Luxon
Stuff National and Act could form government, new Taxpayers’ Union Curia poll suggests
The Spinoff National moves ahead of Labour in new poll
RNZ Taxpayers Union-Curia poll points towards National-ACT government
RNZ The Panel with Ali Jones and Jeremy Elwood (Part One) (11:44)
Te Ao Māori News Poll: National + Act coalition could fly
The Daily Blog BREAKING: New Taxpayers Union Poll – ACT soar to victory while Greens stall!
Newstalk ZB Barry Soper: ZB senior political correspondent on Chris Luxon ruling out working with Te Pāti Māori after the general election
The Working Group with David Seymour, Matthew Hooton & Damien Grant
Newstalk ZB David Seymour: Act leader says a vote for Act prevents a National govt that campaigns from the right and governs from the left
Newstalk ZB Aaron Dahmen: Te Pāti Māori's glee has been palpable over the last few days
NZ Herald Herald’s poll of polls shows Christopher Luxon’s big gamble
NBR Political jockeying, budget pressures, election race
Kiwiblog Bet you none of them have paid additional tax?
Gisborne Herald Sentiment might be shifting again
Gone by Lunchtime Coalitions, coronations and chaos
Newstalk ZB Friday Faceoff: Josie Pagani and Peter Dunne (24:16)
RNZ Week in Politics: Te Pāti Māori in spotlight as Luxon paints a picture of 'chaos'
Indian Newslink Labour and National stay in close fight, not their leaders
The Press It's time to drop the 5% MMP threshold and let more smaller parties into Parliament
Rotorua Now New political poll: Main parties in a tight race
Newstalk ZB Kerre Woodham: I don't think it's unreasonable to have a co-analysis of any government programme
InfraNews Campaign launched against ‘undemocratic’ RMA reform
The Post Callum Purves: If the Government really wants to tackle cost of living, it needs to kick its spending habit
The Spinoff Free prescriptions an ‘important step forward’ – Greens
Indian Newslink Labour’s populist budget of relief brings a few surprises
Stuff Trustee tax increase 'is response to spike in trust use to avoid tax'
RNZ Political opponents take aim at Budget 2023: 'Blowout', 'broke', 'Budget for the rich'
Stuff The no frills, higher bills Budget
Feds News Federated Farmers launches nine-stop RMA rural roadshow
The Spinoff Five very similar polls, three very different results
NZ Herald On the Tiles: Episode 54 – Post-Budget, post-polls, and post-housing u-turns (02:51)
Stuff Janet Wilson: National should be doing better in the polls, but it's not happening
Otago Daily Times Callum Purves: Spotlight on power imbalance
Star News Taxpayers Union trying to halt RMA reforms
whatsoninvers.nz Taxpayers' Union Launches Nationwide Hands Off Our Homes! Roadshow
The Working Group with Ruth Richardson, Bernard Hickey and Damien Grant
The Common Room NZ "Co-governance for your deck!"
The Taxpayers’ Union has condemned the Government’s announcement that it will increase the trustee tax rate to 39 cents in the dollar to align it with the highest personal income tax rate.
Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Callum Purves, said:
“Chris Hipkins’s ‘no new taxes’ pledge lasted about a week with today’s trustee tax rate hike. It’s a broken promise.
”The Government is trying to justify this tax hike by pointing to the most wealthy. But those people can keep money within company structures and pay the 28% company tax rate. In reality this tax grab will hit small business owners who often hold business in trusts for legitimate reasons.”
Commenting on today’s budget announcement, Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Callum Purves, said:
“With the exception of rolling out free ECE to two years and dropping prescription co-payments, there is almost nothing that the average taxpayer receives from today, except higher fuel taxes and a promise to increase trustee taxes next year.
“The effects of record high levels of inflation mean that families are paying higher levels of taxation each and every year. Instead of any tax relief in this budget, they get a LED light bulb, and a bus ride for their kids.
“Compared to the half-year fiscal and economic update, the revised Treasury forecasts are alarming. Gross debt is projected to be $21 billion higher by 2027 than estimated just 6 months ago – despite Grant Robertson’s attempts to paint a rosier picture.
“Government is driving inflation even higher. Government is forecast never to return to the size as a proportion of the economy as pre-COVID. It needs to tackle its spending problem, and this budget just doesn’t deliver.”
The Taxpayers’ Union has slammed the Government’s decision to hike fuel taxes from July. The 25 cent reduction in petrol excise (29 cents with GST) and the equivalent reduction in diesel road user charges will be scrapped at the end of June.
Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Callum Purves, said:
“Despite all the promises of focussing the cost of living, July’s fuel tax hikes contained in today’s budget will hit Kiwis already struggling with rising inflation. Outside the main cities, most people still rely on their cars to get about on a daily basis. This increase will particularly hit lower income families and New Zealanders living in rural areas – the very people struggling the most with the costs of living.
“If the Government stopped allowing the National Land Transport Fund to subsidize loss-making railway lines, walking and cycle ways, and even the expensive ‘Road to Zero’ advertising campaign, it could maintain fuel taxes at lower levels while still maintaining and investing in our roading network.”
Taxpayers’ Union welcomes ‘no new taxes’ budget pledge but devil will be in the detail
Commenting on the Prime Minister’s pre-budget speech, Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Callum Purves, said:
“While the cyclone recovery will be costly, hiking taxes on hardworking New Zealanders during a cost of living crisis would have been the wrong approach. We also welcome the ruling out of a capital gains tax or wealth tax for this year's budget, which would have stifled investment and driven high-net worth individuals abroad who make a large contribution to the funding of our public services.
“But the Prime Minister’s ‘no new taxes’ pledge must not ring hollow. After all the talk yesterday of the wealthy not paying their ‘fair share’ in tax, it is disappointing that the Government has not yet dropped its plans for a regressive fuel tax hike in June that will disproportionately hit poor and rural communities.
“Moreover, with inflation continuing to run high, the problem of bracket creep means that many Kiwis are paying an ever higher share of their income to the Government. This particularly hurts those on middle incomes.
“No new taxes might be a good election slogan, but for it to be true, the Government must refrain from hiking fuel taxes and address the inflation tax.”
Waka Kotahi’s fee changes a blatant tax grab and additional barrier to upskilling
Changes to motor vehicle licensing and registration fees will whack productive New Zealanders with higher costs while Waka Kotahi (New Zealand Transport Agency) continues to grow its backroom bureaucracy warns the New Zealand Taxpayers' Union.
When the proposed changes were announced for consultation last year, the Taxpayers Union warned against the changes. Waka Kotahi is expected to collect an additional $66 million in annual revenue as a result of the changes plus any additional money taken from the National Land Transport Fund — $35 million was the figure proposed last year.
Winners from the changes:
Losers from the changes:
Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Callum Purves says:
“We warned against these changes last year when the consultation was announced. Jacking up fees for hard-working New Zealanders while reducing costs on convicted drink drivers and collectors of exotic vehicles is neither fair nor necessary.
“The real winner from these changes is Waka Kotahi’s bureaucracy which, based on the consultation document, plans to employ an additional 265 full-time equivalent staff – a 55.6% increase on 2018 numbers.
“Particularly concerning is the increased license endorsement costs for Uber, taxi, forklift and tow-truck drivers. These endorsement fees act as a barrier to low-income New Zealanders considering upskilling and will simply exacerbate the cost of living crisis for these individuals."
Joining the Taxpayers' Union costs only $25 and entitles you to attend our annual conference, AGM and other events.
With your support we can make the Taxpayers' Union a strong voice exposing waste and standing up for Kiwi taxpayers.
Often the best information comes from those inside the public service or local government. We guarantee your anonymity and your privacy.