Join Us
Joining the Taxpayers' Union costs only $25 and entitles you to attend our annual conference, AGM and other events.
Responding to the announcement of the plan to repeal of Labour’s ‘wellbeing’ provisions in the Public Finance Act, Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross said:
“Finally, the Minister of Finance is free to focus what they can actually control -- balancing the books, bringing down debt, and restoring the economy.”
“Loneliness, housing quality, and happiness all matter, but trying to legislate for ‘the vibe’ was never going to work. Real wellbeing comes from more opportunities in an economy with low inflation, stable debt, and rising incomes that let Kiwis afford the services and lifestyle they need to thrive.”
“What did the last Government's ‘wellbeing’ obsession give us? They chased the outcomes without doing the groundwork, turning surpluses into runaway deficits, tripling government debt, and letting inflation rip. It’s time to turn the page on his failed experiment and let the Finance Minister focus on the figures, not just the feelings.”
Responding to the Reserve Bank’s decision to cut the Official Cash Rate (OCR) by 25 basis points to 3.25 percent, Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross said:
“As expected, the Reserve Bank has cut interest rates. But it’s clear the Government is relying on these cuts to do the heavy lifting.”
“With no credible path back to surplus and a so-called ‘Growth Budget’ offering just one pro-growth policy, Nicola Willis seems content to try and outsource economic recovery to the Reserve Bank.”
“Growth is anaemic, yet the Government’s strategy amounts to crossing its fingers and hoping falling interest rates will do the job for them. That’s not leadership - it’s abdication.”
“Nicola Willis missed a golden opportunity to cut spending, boost growth, and chart a course back into the black. Kiwis can’t afford another five years of government-by-wishful-thinking.”
Responding to the Green Party’s claim that Budget 2025 failed to account for up to $714 million in increased KiwiSaver costs across the public sector, Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross said:
“If there’s a multi-million-dollar hole in the Budget, the answer isn’t to raid Budget 2026, as Nicola Willis has suggested, it’s to find savings. And that starts by scrapping the taxpayer-funded KiwiSaver handout altogether.”
“This $521-a-year giveaway, now halved and means-tested, has already been flagged by both Treasury and Inland Revenue, who recommended scrapping it entirely. It does little to boost real savings and means-testing it now adds a costly administrative mess.”
“Let’s not paper over the problem. If there’s a fiscal hole, the fix is clear: scrap the subsidy before it chews through Budget 2026.”
I'm just back from the 2025 Budget lock-up, where the team have been pouring through the documents under embargo released by the Government (i.e. the new spending announcements and political ’spin’) and the Treasury (where the real juice is - the state of the economy, the Government books, and the forecasts).
The “Growth Budget" is a fudge. It was supposed to do three things: tackle overspending, get on top of the deficit, and ‘go for growth’. It's failed all three.
In opposition, Nicola Willis described Labour’s Grant Robertson as having an “addiction to spending”. But Budget 2025 continues to increase Core Crown spending compared to the current year both in nominal terms and as a percentage of the economy!
Nicola Willis promised to balance the books. The OBEGAL (the traditional measure of whether a government is in surplus) never gets into surplus according to Treasury forecasts! Nicola Willis has had to make up a new measure to exclude the ACC deficit to create an illusion of a laughably small $214m surplus in 2029 (she calls it “OBEGALx”).
And the underlying ‘structural deficit’ (which removes the one-offs and swings in the economic cycle) has actually increased this year, according to Treasury’s analysis.
Debt is already hitting hard. This year, Treasury forecasts interest costs this year alone amount to $9.5 billion (that’s $467 for every Kiwi household). To put in perspective, that interest amount is the same money needed to fund the entire Police, Ministry of Justice, Customs Service, Corrections, and the defence forces combined!
If this is what fiscal responsibility looks like, God help us.
The Government has made a huge deal about this being a “Growth Budget”. But the sole growth measure (they’ve labelled it “Investment Boost”) is an accelerated depreciation regime that is laughably small: Nicola Willis says the headline ‘go for growth' policy will add 1.0 percent of additional GDP over 20 years.
That is not a typo. Going for Growth amounts to 1.0 percent over 20 years. Not one percent per year. One percent in total. It’s literally in the Finance Minister’s press release.
What can I say other than, if you were hoping for something bold, you’ll be disappointed.
As always, there’s quite a bit more for health, education, and a little for law and order/justice. The main surprise is changes to Kiwisaver (increasing the default rates and reducing the taxpayer contribution).
There’s also a great little initiative to stop 18 and 19 year olds getting the dole unless they actually need it! (Basically, it won’t be available if they have family support - so they can’t sit at home on the couch while being subsidised by the taxpayer). But it doesn’t come into effect until 2027!
There’s also an initiative we quite like: doctors’ prescriptions will be extended to up to one year, rather than the current three months. That will save on doctors visits, and will help those on repeat medications.
This year, we went into the Budget with our friend, former Reserve Bank and Treasury Economist, Michael Reddell. Writing for Economic News, he provided this initial analysis:
This year’s Budget represents another lost opportunity, and probably the last one before next year’s election when there might have been a chance for some serious fiscal consolidation. The government should have been focused on securing progress back towards a balanced budget. Instead, the focus seems to have been on doing just as much spending as they could get away with without markedly further worsening our decade of government deficits.
OBEGAL - the traditional measure of the operating deficit, and the one preferred by The Treasury - is a bit further away from balance by the end of the forecast period (28/29) than it was the last time we saw numbers in the HYEFU. There will be at least a decade of operating deficits, and even the reduction in the projected deficits over the next few years relies on little more than “lines on a graph” – statements about how small future operating allowances will be - that are quite at odds with this government’s record on overall total spending. Core Crown spending as a share of GDP is projected to be 32.9 per cent of GDP in 25/26, up from 32.7 per cent in 24/25 (and compared with the 31.8 per cent in the last full year Grant Robertson was responsible for). The government has proved quite effective in finding savings in places, but all and more of those savings have been used to fund other initiatives. Neither total spending nor deficits (as a share of GDP) are coming down.
Fiscal deficits fluctuate with the state of the economic cycle, and one-offs can muddy the waters too. However, Treasury produces regular estimates of what economists call the structural deficit - the bit that won’t go away by itself. For 25/26, Treasury estimates that this structural deficit will be around 2.6 per cent of GDP, worse than the deficit of 1.9 per cent in 24/25 (and also worse than the last full year Grant Robertson was responsible for). There is no evidence at all that deficits are being closed, and the ageing population pressures get closer by the year.
Some things aren’t under the government’s direct control. The BEFU documents today highlight the extent to which Treasury has revised down again forecasts of the ratio of tax to GDP (which reflects very poorly on Treasury who rashly assumed that far too much of the temporary Covid boost would prove to be permanent). But, on the other hand, the forecasts published today also assume a materially high terms of trade (export prices relative to import prices), which provides a windfall lift in tax revenue. Forecast fluctuations will happen, but the overall stance of fiscal policy is simply a series of government choices. Unfortunate ones on this occasion.
A few weeks ago the IMF produced its latest set of fiscal forecasts. I highlighted then that on their numbers New Zealand had one the very largest structural fiscal deficits of any advanced economy (and that we were worse on that ranking than we’d been just 18 months ago when the IMF did the numbers just before our election). The IMF methodology will be a bit different from Treasury’s but there is nothing in this Budget suggesting New Zealand’s relative position will have improved. We used to have some of the best fiscal numbers anywhere in the advanced world, but as things have been going – under both governments - in the last few years we are on the sort of path that will, before long, turn us into a fairly highly indebted advanced economy, one unusually vulnerable to things like expensive natural disasters.
This is my eleventh Budget lock-up. My impression from the Q&A with the Ministers is that the Government are proud that they’ve managed to basically keep stuff the same while squeezing a little more from the whole government. They have shifted money into higher priority initiatives (a good thing!), but it tends to be within the existing classes of spending. That means none of the sacred cows or unaffordable elephants in the room have been touched.
My greatest surprise is the lack of growth initiatives. Going for growth means macroeconomic reform to get the Government out of the way of business. A 20 percent accelerated depreciation regime is good, but it’s surely the least significant Budget headline grabber / key initiative, I can recall.
And the fundamentals stay the same: we’re spending too much, as laid out by Treasury. The underlying ‘structural deficit’ is larger than last year, not smaller. We’re going to need a bigger debt clock!
Such a disappointment after so much talk of ‘going for growth’ and ‘getting the books back into shape’.
![]() |
|
Ps. here are the media releases issued by the team.
The Fudge Formerly Known as the Growth Budget
Local Councils Get a Bailout in Budget 2025
Parents, not the nanny state, should be responsible for school leavers
‘We’re going to need a bigger debt clock’ – no plan for tackling runaway debt
Nicola Willis' fudge-it 'growth' budget
The Taxpayers’ Union is slamming the Government’s lack of ambition when it comes to promoting growth, highlighted by the failure to implement full expensing of capital expenditure.
The “Investment Boost” programme will instead allow businesses to deduct just 20 percent of the value of new assets in the year of purchase.
Commenting, Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross said:
“Where’s the ambition? The Government admits its ‘Investment Boost’ programme will lead to just a 1 percent boost to GDP over 20 years.”
“Willis has clearly recognised that trapping businesses’ tax refunds in IRD spreadsheets for a decade before they can claim them back fully cripples investment and growth. So why has she left 80 percent of them trapped in depreciation schedules?”
“New Zealand has some of the lowest productivity in the developed world. We need the whole spoonful of pro-growth medicine, not half-baked half-answers.”
“We were promised ‘growth’ and ‘ambition’. We got a flop.”
Commenting on Budget 2025’s failure to restrain New Zealand’s runaway Government debt, Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross said:
“Debt is increasing every single year over the forecast period in Budget 2025, reaching $108,700 per household by 2029. That’s $2,000 more than the last forecasts issued just five months ago.”
“Grant Robertson’s last Budget had debt peak at 39.3 percent of the economy – Nicola Willis will now see it reach 46.0 percent. This is in the danger zone for a small trade-exposed country like New Zealand.”
“A Government preaching responsibility is lumbering each household with $5,776 per year in interest costs by 2027. That’s more than the budgets for primary schools, secondary schools, and the police combined.”
“Nicola Willis was elected with the promise of fixing the country’s finances, but what she’s delivered today is a promise to keep robbing our kids and grandkids.”
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming the decision to limit access for 18 and 19 year olds who are not working or in education to Jobseeker Support and Emergency Benefit, but is questioning why this change isn’t being implemented until July 2027.
Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross asks:
“Getting teenagers off the couch is a good idea so why wait two years?”
“We need to be realistic about what we can afford as a country. Taxpayers shouldn’t be stumping up to support school-leavers who simply don’t want to work.”
“Those 18 and 19 year olds who need support can still get it – that’s not changing. So why are taxpayers stuck paying millions for people who don’t need it?"
The Taxpayers’ Union is slamming the Government’s decision to expand the rates relief regime for SuperGold cardholders, describing it as a ‘bailout for wasteful councils’.
Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman, James Ross said “Instead of forcing local councils to live within their means, Simon Watts has caved to the pressure from Local Government New Zealand by issuing deficit spending to 'shut up the oldies' complaining about unaffordable rates. It will mean councils will be under even less pressure to reign in their costs, and shifts the burden of out-of-control rates onto taxpayers.”
“Shifting costs from retiree ratepayers onto taxpayers does not make councils more efficient or tackle the costs of living. It’s why we need rates capping right now - as done in some states in Australia and councils across the UK."
“While the Minister refused to meet the likes of the Federated Farmers, the Taxpayers’ Union, and other groups concerned about rates - those dinners with LGNZ and council-lovies have clearly worked. They get a bailout, while ratepayers and taxpayers fly in the wind."
The New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union is slamming Budget 2025 as a waste of time and hype, with its team of analysts in this year’s Budget left asking ‘is that it?’
"Nicola Willis has failed,” says Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman Jordan Williams. “This Budget could easily have been delivered by Grant Robertson."
“Willis promised to tackle the last Government’s ‘addiction to spending’. Spending is going up as a proportion of the economy in this year’s Budget compared to the current year. Core Crown Expenses are forecast to be 32.9 percent in 2025/26 compared to 31.8 percent under Robertson in 2022/23.
“She promised to balance the books. The OBEGAL never gets into surplus according to Treasury forecasts. Willis has had to make up a new measure to exclude the ACC deficit to create an illusion of a laughably small surplus in 2029.”
“And she promised growth. But the headline measure – an accelerated depreciation regime – is basically no better than what the last Labour Government tried immediately after COVID.”
“According to the Budget documents, the Government's headline ‘growth’ policy adds just 1 percent to GDP over 20 years. It is laughable in its small size.”
“More spending, more debt, and nothing to materially shift the dial and grow the economy. It’s not a Growth Budget, it’s a fudge-it."
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming Revenue Minister Simon Watts’ announcement that the proposed Digital Services Tax Bill will be scrapped, but warns that adopting a global alternative could still leave taxpayers even worse off.
Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman James Ross said:
“The Digital Services Tax would inevitably have ended up taxing Kiwis by stealth, either through higher prices or lost services as tech firms pulled out of the market.”
“Other countries have tried and failed. With Trump-era tariffs looming large, now is certainly not the time to invite US retaliation by taking targeted petty swings at American companies.”
“Watts needs to go further. Pursuing the so-called ‘global solution’ doesn’t just lock us into higher taxes, it’s clearly anti-democratic. We should categorically rule out ever handing the power to set our tax rates to overseas bureaucrats far beyond the reach of New Zealand voters.”
“One tax down (for now), but plenty more to go. This Government is still taking more in tax than Grant Robertson ever did, and Budget 2025 is their chance to deliver real tax relief for Kiwis across the board.”
Joining the Taxpayers' Union costs only $25 and entitles you to attend our annual conference, AGM and other events.
With your support we can make the Taxpayers' Union a strong voice exposing waste and standing up for Kiwi taxpayers.
Often the best information comes from those inside the public service or local government. We guarantee your anonymity and your privacy.